STEM club participants differ descriptively from non-participants in GPA, course-taking, test scores, and college desire¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students who participated in math or science clubs had statistically significantly higher math and science GPAs, higher course sequences, higher Peabody PVT scores, and higher desire to attend college than non-participants. → Gottfried 2013
Evidence¶
Gottfried 2013¶
Gottfried, M. A. & Williams, D. (2013). STEM Club Participation and STEM Schooling Outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21 (79). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1361
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Descriptive comparison of the Add Health regression sample (202 participants vs. 3,020 non-participants) in Table 1: participant math GPA 2.60 vs. 2.21, science GPA 2.76 vs. 2.30, and STEM major rate 0.51 vs. 0.30, all flagged as statistically different at p<0.05. These are mean differences, not effect sizes.
"Table 1 suggests that there were statistically significant differences between the math and science GPAs of those students participating versus not participating in math and/or science clubs in school. These differences were tested at the p = 0.05 level."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Science club participation shows no statistically significant relationship with selecting a STEM college major — related
- Math club participation is positively associated with high school math GPA, with a medium standardized relationship that persists after propensity score matching — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Science club participation is positively associated with high school science GPA, significant across all three propensity score matching methods — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The math club–math GPA relationship holds for non-poverty students but not for poverty students, with a race-by-poverty interaction — related
- The science club–science GPA relationship is not significant for Asian students, though the math club relationship is — related
- Gender does not moderate the club participation–GPA relationship in math or science — related
- Math club participation is associated with higher odds of declaring a STEM major in college, remaining significant after propensity score matching — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stem-club-participants-descriptive-differences |
title |
STEM club participants differ descriptively from non-participants in GPA, course-taking, test scores, and college desire |
description |
STEM club participants differ descriptively from non-participants in GPA, course-taking, test scores, and college desire |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gottfried-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.