Claims

Gender does not moderate the club participation–GPA relationship in math or science

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The relationship between math club participation and math GPA, and between science club participation and science GPA, is approximately the same for males and females across OLS and matching models. → Gottfried 2013

Evidence

Gottfried 2013

Gottfried, M. A. & Williams, D. (2013). STEM Club Participation and STEM Schooling Outcomes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 21 (79). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1361

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Fully interacted models in Tables 5 and 6 show similar male and female coefficients (e.g., math: male 0.222, female 0.239 full OLS; science: male 0.224, female 0.285*). The article reports the gender pattern as consistent across both subjects.

"Gender, once again, did not seem to moderate the association of science club participation on science GPA."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gender-does-not-moderate-club-gpa-relationship
title Gender does not moderate the club participation–GPA relationship in math or science
description Gender does not moderate the club participation–GPA relationship in math or science
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2013
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — gottfried-2013

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.