The attitude questionnaire showed high Cronbach's Alpha reliability in both groups¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Cronbach's Alpha coefficients for the mathematics and computer confidence scales were high for both experimental and control groups. → Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015
Evidence¶
Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015¶
Rina Oktaviyanthi, Yani Supriani. (2015). Experimental Design: Utilizing Microsoft Mathematics in Teaching and Learning Calculus. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.6, No.25. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1078520
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Reliability analysis of the two questionnaires (mathematics confidence and computer confidence) administered pre and post to both groups; printed alphas include .863, .836, .909 for the experimental group and .950, .810, .728 for the control group.
"Cronbach’s Alpha reliability pre and post both grou ps, as shown in Table8, are high and accordingly de scribe that the mathematics attitude investigation could b e accepted as a reliable instrument for the purpose of the study."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The DIGISOC questionnaire shows acceptable validity and reliability, including CFA data and favorable Cronbach's alpha coefficients — related
- The MAKQ dimensions show acceptable internal consistency across both studies (alphas 0.77-0.93) — related
- Existing online SRL questionnaires show reliability problems, with most having at least one scale outside the acceptable Cronbach's alpha range — related
- The post-interaction reflection instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .863) — related
- TAILS dimensions show high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.90 — related
- The Microsoft Mathematics group outperformed the control group on the Calculus post test — related
- Students taught with Microsoft Mathematics reported more positive mathematics-confidence attitudes than controls — related
- First-year Calculus students taught with Microsoft Mathematics showed a larger pre-to-post test gain than conventionally taught controls — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.