Claims

First-year Calculus students taught with Microsoft Mathematics showed a larger pre-to-post test gain than conventionally taught controls

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's average pre-to-post difference (5.14) was higher than the control group's (0.82). → Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015

Evidence

Rina Oktaviyanthi 2015

Rina Oktaviyanthi, Yani Supriani. (2015). Utilizing Microsoft Mathematics in Teaching and Learning Calculus. IndoMS-JME, Volume 6, No. 1, January 2015, pp. 53-76. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/ujme

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of two randomly divided classes of first-year students (22 total) at Universitas Serang Raya; the article reports the experimental group's mean gain of 5.14 versus "which is 0.82" for controls, with no test statistic printed.

"In the experimental group can note that the average of the difference between pre test and post test is 5.14 that are significantly higher than in the control group, which is 0.82."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.