Learners taught with the audiovisual method showed higher vocabulary retention in week two than learners taught with the conventional method¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In week two, retention rates were between 60% and 83.33% for the audiovisual group versus 16.66% and 43.33% for the conventional group. → Bozavlı 2017
Evidence¶
Bozavlı 2017¶
Bozavlı, E. (2017). Vocabulary Teaching in Foreign Language via Audiovisual Method Technique of Listening and Following Writing Scripts. International Education Studies, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p129
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Comparison of retention one week after instruction between two groups of 14 French-language-teaching students that the article describes as experimental research with groups "randomly established" (the allocation procedure is not described); each group was taught as one class at a different time, and results were analysed by percentage calculations. The discussion states "Retention rate is just above 70% with audiovisual method, while it is about 25% in conventional method"; the results tables show week-two rates of 60–83.33% (experimental) and 16.66–43.33% (control). No inferential statistics were reported.
"Retention rate is just above 70% with audiovisual method, while it is about 25% in conventional method."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Vocabulary knowledge measured after audiovisual instruction remained stable between week one and week two, with changes restricted to one or two words — related
- Learners taught French vocabulary with an audiovisual method (listening to video pronunciation while following the written script) achieved higher learning success rates in week one than learners taught with the conventional method — related
- Control-group participants showed declining retention success between week one and week two, with 13 of 14 participants declining — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.