Claims

Most individual control-group learners' vocabulary scores declined from post-test to delayed post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 2 studies · 2 causal r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Almost all control-group learners showed a sharp decline in vocabulary test scores between the post-test and delayed post-test. → Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad 2016

q2 i? By the end of week two, 13 of 14 control participants suffered a decline in retention success, of 1 to 5 words out of 30, while one enjoyed a rise limited to one word. → Bozavlı 2017

Evidence

Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad 2016

Nader Asadi Aidinlou & Alireza Moradinejad. (2016). Short-term and Long-term Retention of Vocabulary through Authentic Subtitled Videos. Advances in Language and Literary Studies. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.7n.5p.14

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Per-student comparison of vocabulary test scores in post-test and delayed post-test plotted for the control group in Figure 1; the text states all learners except three had a sharp decline, indicating inefficient long-term retention.

"As Figure 1 shows all learners in the control group (except students no. 10, 12 and 14) had a sharp decline in vocabulary test scores in their delayed post -test."

Bozavlı 2017

Bozavlı, E. (2017). Vocabulary Teaching in Foreign Language via Audiovisual Method Technique of Listening and Following Writing Scripts. International Education Studies, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n5p129

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive analysis of the control group's week-two retention results after conventional vocabulary teaching. The article reports "13 participants suffered a decline in retention success, while one enjoyed a rise, albeit limited to one word"; only one participant remembered 13 words and ten remembered 5 to 10 words. Table 3 shows the size of each change: the 13 declines were of 1 to 5 words out of 30 (most of 1 to 3 words), and the group's success rates fell from 26.66–50% in week one to 16.66–43.33% in week two. The article does not call the declines sharp.

"13 participants suffered a decline in retention success, while one enjoyed a rise, albeit limited to one word."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
aliases conventional-method-retention-decline
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.