Claims

Authentic-video instruction produced significantly higher post-test prosodic ability than traditional instruction for Iranian intermediate EFL learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Iranian intermediate EFL learners taught prosodic features through authentic videos significantly outperformed a traditionally taught control group on a post-test of prosodic ability (t = 2.495, p = .017). → Namaziandost 2018

Evidence

Namaziandost 2018

Namaziandost, E., Esfahani, F. R., & Hashemifarnia, A. (2018). The Impact of Using Authentic Videos on Prosodic Ability among Foreign Language Learners. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 375-390. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1191678

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 40 Iranian intermediate EFL learners (experimental n=20, control n=18/20 as printed) taught over 12 sessions; independent samples t-test on post-test totals gave t = 2.495, p = .017, mean difference 9.50000, favouring the video group — "a significant difference is observed". No effect size is printed.

"The independent samples t -test was calcu lated with the T. Value of 2.495 and the P. value equalling 0.017. These findings demonstrate that a significant difference is observed."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.