Claims

The experimental group's language development total scores rise significantly from pre-test to post-test after the audio-visual intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's mean language development total increased from 51.94 at pre-test to 100.50 at post-test, a difference the article reports as significant at the 0.01 level (t = 14.41). → Roul 2014

Evidence

Roul 2014

Sushanta Kumar Roul. (2014). Language Development of the Preschool Children: The Effects of an Audio-Visual Intervention Program in Delhi. International Journal of Instruction, 7(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085265

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group pre-test/post-test comparison of the 50-child experimental group on the Language Development Test total. The article reports means of 51.94 and 100.5 and a t-ratio of 14.41, significant at 0.01, and interprets this as a positive effect of the program.

"It can be seen that the mean pre-test and post-test scores of experimental group language development total is found to be 51.94 and 100.5 respectively with S.D. 14.91 and 18.26. The t-ratio between the two groups comes out to be 14.41. It is significant at 0.01 level of significance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.