Interactive 3D stereoscopic video produced higher post-test scores on anatomical relationships and clinical reasoning than 2D video (Bernard et al.)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In a single-site controlled study, the 3D group's post-test average scores were higher than the 2D group's on anatomical linkages and clinical inference/reasoning, while basic anatomical knowledge scores were comparable. → K Anniesmitha 2026
Evidence¶
K Anniesmitha 2026¶
K Anniesmitha, Rao K G Mohandas, Aithal P Ashwini, Bandekar Nikita N., Mandal Tatiyana, George Bincy M. (2026). Effectiveness of technology-enhanced learning in neuroanatomy education among health professionals - a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09764-w
q3 · i? · review · r3
Prospective controlled study of 3D vs 2D stereoscopic neuroanatomy video (175 baseline participants; 2D n = 86, 3D n = 91). The 3D group scored "mean 86.4% vs. 63.5%, p = 0.004" on anatomical linkages; the total-score comparison (p = 0.07) was not significant.
"In terms of anatomical linkages (mean 86.4% vs. 63.5%, p = 0.004), clinical inference/reasoning (mean 76.8% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.023), and total notes (mean 76.8% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.07), the 3D group's average scores on the post-test were higher."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 3D virtual-reality lecture was statistically non-inferior to 2D lecture on knowledge and rated better on spatial understanding and enjoyment (Kockro et al.) — related
- Students who experienced the virtual field trip via a 3D HMD scored higher on a delayed posttest roughly three weeks later than 2D-video students — related
- AR and 2D methods boosted knowledge similarly, but the 3D AR method drew greater satisfaction and student preference (Lopez et al.) — related
- 3D visualisation training outperformed traditional teaching on exam outcomes and clinical practice assessment (Shao et al.) — related
- Spatial ability correlated positively with neuroanatomy performance across pretest and both quizzes in a crossover 3D-module study (Allen et al.) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.