Claims

Both demonstration and lecture methods were effective in improving academic performance in economics concepts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test means rose substantially above pre-test means for both the demonstration group (e.g., 19.34 to 67.80 in School A) and the lecture group (19.23 to 55.38 in School A). → Muhammad 2016

Evidence

Muhammad 2016

Muhammad, A. U., Bala, D., & Ladu, K. M. (2016). Effectiveness of Demonstration and Lecture Methods in Learning Concept in Economics among Secondary School Students in Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(12). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1099610

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive statistics from Tables 1a and 1b show large pre-to-post gains for both methods over the four-week treatment with 25 WAEC multiple-choice items. The article reports these as descriptive means without a within-group significance test.

"On post-test re sults, the mean of demonstration group was 64.30 an d standard deviation of 17.26, while the mean of lecture group was 55.38 and standard deviation of 13.89 for scho ol A and School B."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.