Claims

No significant gender difference in post-test writing performance among students taught with brainstorming strategy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male and female students in the brainstorming experimental group did not differ significantly in post-test writing performance (t = -0.41, df = 38, Sig. 0.67). → Amoush 2015

Evidence

Amoush 2015

Amoush, K. H. (2015). The Impact of Employing Brainstorming Strategy on Improving Writing Performance of English Major Students at Balqa Applied University in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(35). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1086359

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Independent-samples t-test comparing male (n=20, M=47.38, SD 2.96) and female (n=20, M=47.76, SD 2.56) students within the experimental group on post-test essay scores. The difference "was not significant", so males and females were equal in writing performance.

"the mean of the females was a little bit higher than that of the males’ .this difference between the post- test means scores was not significant as t value was -0.41 with degree of freedom (38)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.