Claims

Within the brainstorming-taught experimental group, female students significantly outperformed male students on the English grammar post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the experimental group, females scored significantly higher than males on the post-test (p = 0.002), a mean difference of 4.53 points. → Nibal Abdelkarim Mousa Malkawi & Mona Smadi 2018

Evidence

Nibal Abdelkarim Mousa Malkawi & Mona Smadi 2018

Nibal Abdelkarim Mousa Malkawi & Mona Smadi. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using Brainstorming Strategy in the Development of Academic Achievement of Sixth Grade Students in English Grammar at Public Schools in Jordan. International Education Studies, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v11n3p92

q2 · i? · causal · r1

T-test comparing experimental-group post-test scores by gender: males (n = 70) mean 16.140, SD 4.193; females (n = 50) mean 20.670, SD 4.583; significance "(0.002)", favoring females. The article reports a mean difference of (4.53).

"statistically significant differences between males and females students of the experimental group in the post achievement test in English grammar for the sixth grade in favor of females, where the statistically significance reached (0.002)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.