Claims

Anxiety relief from cyclic sighing is time-locked to learning-proximal moments, with lower anxiety at 11:00/13:00/15:00 prompts than at 20:00 during intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? During intervention, the breathwork group showed lower anxiety at learning-proximal prompts relative to end-of-day than controls (β = −0.17, 95% HPD [−0.33, −0.01]); the difference was not credible post-intervention. → Wang 2026

Evidence

Wang 2026

Wang, P., Ganushchak, L., Welie, C., & van Steensel, R. (2026). Learning proximal cyclic sighing buffers anxiety across learning moments and boredom across days. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00446-2

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Group × Phase × Prompt-type multilevel analysis of EMA data from the RCT (n = 84), contrasting 11:00/13:00/15:00 prompts with the 20:00 prompt. The breathwork group's within-day contrast was β = −0.20 during intervention (95% HPD [−0.31, −0.09]) and returned to β = 0.00 post-intervention. No standardized effect size is printed for this contrast, so impact is null.

"The between-group difference in this contrast was credible (β = −0.17, 95% HPD [−0.33, −0.01]), indicating that the anxiety-reducing benefit of breathwork was acute and time-specific"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.