Claims

Cyclic sighing buffers phase-level anxiety accumulation: controls' anxiety rose across the intervention while the breathwork group stayed near baseline

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · checked against its sources 2026-10-26 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Under learning-as-usual, anxiety increased from baseline during intervention and remained elevated post; in the breathwork group it stayed near baseline, with credible group differences in trajectory. → Wang 2026

Evidence

Wang 2026

Wang, P., Ganushchak, L., Welie, C., & van Steensel, R. (2026). Learning proximal cyclic sighing buffers anxiety across learning moments and boredom across days. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-026-00446-2

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Bayesian multilevel phase-contrast analysis of EMA anxiety ratings from the 20-day RCT (6,281 observations, n = 84). Controls showed "anxiety increased from Baseline during the Intervention phase (β = 0.43, 95% HPD [0.25, 0.61])"; the breathwork group's intervention contrast was β = 0.10 and post contrast β = 0.02.

"In the control group, anxiety increased from Baseline during the Intervention phase (β = 0.43, 95% HPD [0.25, 0.61]) and remained elevated in the Post phase (β = 0.30, 95% HPD [0.08, 0.50])."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.