Claims

Burnout dimensions (exhaustion and disengagement) negatively predict future teacher self-efficacy at adjacent time points

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Disengagement at one time point negatively predicts TSE at the next time point. → Kim 2020

Evidence

Kim 2020

Kim, Lisa E. and Burić, Irena. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout: Determining the directions of prediction through an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000424

q3 · i? · associational · r3

Cross-lagged SEM paths in the final covariate-adjusted TSE–Disengagement model. The article reports "disengagement at Time 1 negatively predicted TSE at Time 2" with β = -.120 and β = -.180 for the second interval, both statistically significant.

"disengagement at Time 1 negatively predicted TSE at Time 2 (β = -.120, p < .001) and disengagement at Time 2 negatively predicted TSE at Time 3 (β = -.180, p < .001)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id burnout-predicts-future-tse
title Burnout dimensions (exhaustion and disengagement) negatively predict future teacher self-efficacy at adjacent time points
description Burnout dimensions (exhaustion and disengagement) negatively predict future teacher self-efficacy at adjacent time points
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kim-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.