Claims

TSE does not consistently predict future burnout; only one significant path (TSE to disengagement, Time 1 to Time 2) emerged

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the covariate-adjusted model, the only significant TSE-to-burnout path was TSE predicting disengagement from Time 1 to Time 2. → Kim 2020

Evidence

Kim 2020

Kim, Lisa E. and Burić, Irena. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy and burnout: Determining the directions of prediction through an autoregressive cross-lagged panel model. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000424

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Cross-lagged paths from TSE to both burnout dimensions in the final covariate-adjusted models. The article reports "the only statistically significant path was TSE predicting disengagement from Time 1 to Time 2" with β = -.075; no other TSE-to-burnout path reached significance.

"we found that the only statistically significant path was TSE predicting disengagement from Time 1 to Time 2 (β = -.075, p < .05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tse-inconsistently-predicts-burnout
title TSE does not consistently predict future burnout; only one significant path (TSE to disengagement, Time 1 to Time 2) emerged
description TSE does not consistently predict future burnout; only one significant path (TSE to disengagement, Time 1 to Time 2) emerged
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kim-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.