Claims

CBI produced higher academic achievement than the conventional method for B.Ed. students in Optional 1 English

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental (CBI) group significantly outperformed the control group on Post-test I (t = 8.1) and Post-test II (t = 8.5). → Arulselvi 2016

Evidence

Arulselvi 2016

Evangelin Arulselvi. (2016). The Effectiveness of Content-Based Instruction in English Language Teaching. Excellence in Education Journal, 5(2). https://www.google.com/search?q=%22The+Effectiveness+of+Content-Based+Instruction+in+English+Language+Teaching%22

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental control-group pretest–post-test study with 30 learners per group from a College of Education in Salem District; the CBI group scored M = 71 vs control M = 52.5 on Post-test I, a "significant difference between these two scores by the t-value 8.1".

"Achievement scores of the Post-test I of the control and experimental groups were compared and there existed significant difference between these two scores by the t-value 8.1 which is significant at 0.05 level."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.