Mutual learning approach outperforms conventional instruction in academic achievement among B.Ed Optional II English students¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The experimental group taught via mutual learning significantly outperformed the control group taught via conventional methods on Post Test I achievement in Optional II English. → Arulselvi 2013 q2 i? The experimental group also significantly outperformed the control group on Post Test II, indicating the advantage held across successive units. → Arulselvi 2013 (2)

Evidence¶

Arulselvi 2013¶

Arulselvi, E. (2013). Effectiveness of Mutual Learning Approach in the Academic Achievement of B.Ed Students in Learning Optional II English. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(3), 25-31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068866

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental comparison of two groups of 25 B.Ed students each in a College of Education in Namakkal District; the experimental group used mutual learning teams while the control received traditional instruction. The article infers that "the experimental group excels the control group in academic performance."

"Achievement scores of the Post test I of the control and experimental groups were compared and there exists significant difference between these two scores by the 't' value 13.52 which is significant at 0.01 level."

Arulselvi 2013 (2)¶

Arulselvi, E. (2013). Effectiveness of Mutual Learning Approach in the Academic Achievement of B.Ed Students in Learning Optional II English. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(3), 25-31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1068866

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Second post-test comparison on a different unit (Teaching Vocabulary, Reference and Study skills) between the same two groups of 25 learners each. The article again infers that "the experimental group excels the control group in academic performance."

"Achievement scores of the Post test II of the control and experimental groups were compared and there exists significant difference between these two scores by the 't' value 12.5 which is significant at 0.01 level."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• CBI produced higher academic achievement than the conventional method for B.Ed. students in Optional 1 English — related
• The control group showed no significant pre-test to post-test difference under conventional teaching — related
• Experimental group shows significant pre-to-post achievement gains under mutual learning — related
• Secondary students taught in an e-classroom with ICT resources significantly outperform students taught by conventional methods on post-test achievement — related
• Concept mapping teaching produced significantly higher biology achievement than lecture method among Nigerian Senior Secondary II students — related
• Junior secondary students taught algebraic expressions with card games and algebra tic-tacmatics achieved significantly higher adjusted post-test scores than students taught by conventional lecture method — related
• Undergraduate students taught IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry through an e-content package scored significantly higher on the post-test than students taught by conventional methods — related