Claims

CBL significantly enhances communication and collaboration skills compared with LBL (RR = 2.49)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? CBL significantly enhances pharmacy students' communication and collaboration skills compared with LBL (RR = 2.49, 95% CI [1.17–5.27]). → Chen Min 2025

Evidence

Chen Min 2025

Chen Min, Li Xinyao, Liu Qingming, Zhou Jing, Fan Xiaofang, Liu Yantao, Lin Yunzhu, Ni Jiaqi. (2025). The effectiveness of case-based learning compared with lecture-based learning in pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07927-9

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Five studies (373 students in all) assessed communication and collaboration skills with questionnaire surveys; the meta-analysis pooled the two that quantitatively reported grading scores comparing CBL and LBL groups, and found a significant positive result (RR = 2.49, 95% CI 1.17–5.27), with high heterogeneity (I2 = 86%). The result is a risk ratio, not a standardized mean difference, so its size is coded unknown (i?); it is not a null result.

"Meta-analysis of these two studies revealed that CBL significantly enhanced communication and collaboration skills compared to LBL (RR = 2.49, 95% CI [1.17–5.27], I2 = 86%, P < 0.05)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.