Claims

Students report higher class satisfaction with CBL than with LBL (RR = 1.63)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students in the CBL group report significantly higher class satisfaction than students in the LBL group (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.22–2.18]). → Chen Min 2025

Evidence

Chen Min 2025

Chen Min, Li Xinyao, Liu Qingming, Zhou Jing, Fan Xiaofang, Liu Yantao, Lin Yunzhu, Ni Jiaqi. (2025). The effectiveness of case-based learning compared with lecture-based learning in pharmacy education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07927-9

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of three of nine questionnaire-survey studies (1,181 students evaluated overall) with quantitative satisfaction data. High heterogeneity (I2 = 70%); no standardized effect size printed, so impact is null.

"Meta-analysis of the three studies [21, 23, 29] with quantitative data on class satisfaction revealed that students in the CBL group reported significantly higher class satisfaction than those in the LBL group (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.22–2.18], I2 = 70%, P < 0.05)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.