Claims

More PBL than LBL students report satisfaction with improved communication skills (RR = 1.66)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-31 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? A higher proportion of PBL than LBL students believed PBL improved their communication skills (64.8% vs 44.3%; RR = 1.66, 95% CI 1.22–2.27). → Yang X 2024

Evidence

Yang X 2024

Yang X, Yang Z, Ma S, Yan M, Yang Y. (2024). Evaluation of problem-based learning for pharmacology based on a comprehensive analysis in undergraduate students. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039376

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 6 studies involving 878 students, of whom 460 received PBL, reporting satisfaction with improved communication skills, random-effects model. The pooled risk ratio favored PBL: "RR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.22, 2.27], P = .001, I2 = 85%"; no standardized effect size was printed for this outcome.

"Compared with LBL, a higher proportion of students believed that PBL had a greater impact on improving communication skills thinking (64.8% in the PBL group vs 44.3% in the LBL group, RR = 1.66, 95% CI [1.22, 2.27], P = .001, I2 = 85%)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.