The CIEA did not produce a significant group-by-time difference on the Prosocial-Egotistical basic scale¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Contrary to the expectation based on Krevans and Gibbs's family-context findings, no significant difference on the Prosocial-Egotistical scale emerged between the EG and CG over time. → Robi Kroflič and Helena Smrtnik Vitulić 2015

Evidence¶

Robi Kroflič and Helena Smrtnik Vitulić 2015¶

Robi Kroflič and Helena Smrtnik Vitulić. (2015). The Effects of the Comprehensive Inductive Educational Approach on the Social Behaviour of Preschool Children in Kindergarten. c e p s Journal, Vol.5, No1. https://journals.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Null result from the same quasi-experimental teacher-rating study. The authors explain that the questionnaire assesses prosocial behaviour in a broader sense, including group activities, competitiveness and (dis)satisfaction when the teacher attends to other children. No effect size is printed.

"However, the study did not confirm significant differences on the Prosocial-Egotistical basic scale between the EG and the CG in time."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Civic Mindedness — outcome: instruction changes it
• Social Awareness and Relationship Skills — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• After CIEA implementation the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on Social Competence, Internalising Problems and General Adaptation composite scales — related
• Five-month implementation of the CIEA produced significant group-by-time interactions favouring the experimental group on five of eight basic social-behaviour scales — related
• Before implementation the experimental and control groups were equivalent on nearly all social-behaviour scales, differing only on Secure-Anxious — related