Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A panel of five experts rated the appropriateness of the developed constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05). → Sapliyan 2023
Evidence¶
Sapliyan 2023¶
Sapliyan, S., Chatwattana, P., & Nilsook, P. (2023). Constructionism Imagineering Learning Model via Metaverse to Enhance Young Innovators. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n4p81
q2 · i? · design · r2
Expert assessment study: five experts in designing and developing learning models and systems from higher education institutions rated the model's compound elements on a five-level rating scale, with interpretation criteria from Kanasutra (1995) classifying 4.50-5.00 as highest. All five assessment issues were rated highest, with item means from 4.71 to 4.86. The result "are the highest appropriate (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05)".
"Results of the assessment of the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse developed (Compound elements) are the highest appropriate (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experts rate the implemented constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.67, S.D. = 0.08) — related
- Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. = 0.27), with learning achievement output rated High — related
- Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning process via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.82, S.D. = 0.40) — related
- Eleven experts rated the tentative STEM-ICT instructional model as appropriate at a high level — related
- Five professionals approved the model as appropriate at a high level — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cilm-metaverse-expert-assessment-highest |
title |
Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05) |
description |
Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.74, S.D. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sapliyan-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.