Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. = 0.27), with learning achievement output rated High¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Expert ratings of the model's individual elements (input factors, learning process, output, feedback) averaged 4.65 (S.D. = 0.27) at the highest level, though the learning-achievement output item was rated High (Mean = 4.29, S.D. = 1.11). → Sapliyan 2023
Evidence¶
Sapliyan 2023¶
Sapliyan, S., Chatwattana, P., & Nilsook, P. (2023). Constructionism Imagineering Learning Model via Metaverse to Enhance Young Innovators. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n4p81
q2 · i? · design · r2
Expert assessment of the model's individual elements on a five-level rating scale. Input-factor items ranged from 4.57 to 5.00, learning-process items from 4.57 to 4.71, and feedback items from 4.57 to 4.71, all Highest; the learning-achievement output item was rated High (Mean = 4.29, S.D. = 1.11). The article states the model "can also be used as a guideline for further development as a constructionism imagineering learning system via metaverse."
"Table 4 Results of the assessment of the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse developed are the highest appropriate (Mean = 4. 65, S.D. = 0.27)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experts rate the implemented constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.67, S.D. = 0.08) — related
- Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning process via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.82, S.D. = 0.40) — related
- Experts rate the constructionism imagineering learning model via metaverse as appropriate at the highest level (Mean = 4.74, S.D. = 0.05) — related
- Undergraduates report very high overall satisfaction with instruction management in the cloud-based constructivism and connectivism learning model — related
- Eleven experts rated the tentative STEM-ICT instructional model as appropriate at a high level — related
- Five professionals approved the model as appropriate at a high level — related
- The TEFA-T model and its supporting products are rated Very Practical by instructors and students — related
- Students in the cloud-based constructivism and connectivism model created 21 educational innovations, four accepted for academic publication — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cilm-individual-elements-assessment |
title |
Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. = 0.27), with learning achievement output rated High |
description |
Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
recheck_by |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sapliyan-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.