The experimental group's ESP scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-test under clicker use, while the control group's did not¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results showed a statistically significant pre-to-post improvement in the experimental group (Z = -3.66, p = .000), with 17 of 19 students improving; the control group's change was not significant (Z = -1.707, p = .088). → Asmalı 2018
Evidence¶
Asmalı 2018¶
Mehmet Asmalı. (2018). Integrating Technology into ESP Classes: Use of Student Response System in English for Specific Purposes Instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 86-104. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1186385
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Within-group pre-post analysis in the same quasi-experiment: the experimental group's mean rose from 48.95 to 61.35 with "Z = -3.66, p = .000" and 17 of 19 students improving, while the control group's change from 42.70 to 44.45 was not significant (Z = -1.707, p = .088). No effect size was printed.
"use of clickers in the experimental group for a 10-week period elicited a statistically significant change in students’ performance in ESP classes according to Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Male and female clicker users did not differ significantly in ESP post-test scores, but only males improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
- The experimental group improved significantly from pre-test to post-test after learning the synthesis strategy — related
- Journal writing was associated with a significant positive change in experimental students' attitudes toward science, while control students' attitudes did not change — related
- The experimental group's achievement scores rose significantly from pre-test to post-test under the technology-supported program — related
- Both experimental and control groups improved their proportional reasoning scores from pretest to posttest — related
- Ten weeks of Kahoot! clicker use produced significantly higher ESP post-test scores than the same instruction without clickers — related
- The control and experimental groups were statistically equivalent on the ESP pre-test before the clicker implementation — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.