Claims

The experimental group's ESP scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-test under clicker use, while the control group's did not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results showed a statistically significant pre-to-post improvement in the experimental group (Z = -3.66, p = .000), with 17 of 19 students improving; the control group's change was not significant (Z = -1.707, p = .088). → Asmalı 2018

Evidence

Asmalı 2018

Mehmet Asmalı. (2018). Integrating Technology into ESP Classes: Use of Student Response System in English for Specific Purposes Instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 86-104. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1186385

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Within-group pre-post analysis in the same quasi-experiment: the experimental group's mean rose from 48.95 to 61.35 with "Z = -3.66, p = .000" and 17 of 19 students improving, while the control group's change from 42.70 to 44.45 was not significant (Z = -1.707, p = .088). No effect size was printed.

"use of clickers in the experimental group for a 10-week period elicited a statistically significant change in students’ performance in ESP classes according to Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test results"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.