Ten weeks of Kahoot! clicker use produced significantly higher ESP post-test scores than the same instruction without clickers¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Post-test scores were significantly higher for the experimental group (Mdn = 63.15) than for the control group (Mdn = 46.05) after a 10-week clicker implementation in ESP classes. → Asmalı 2018
Evidence¶
Asmalı 2018¶
Mehmet Asmalı. (2018). Integrating Technology into ESP Classes: Use of Student Response System in English for Specific Purposes Instruction. Teaching English with Technology, 18(3), 86-104. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1186385
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experimental pre-test/post-test study with two intact classes (experimental n=19, control n=24) of tourism and hospitality students taught by the same instructor with the same materials; Mann-Whitney U test showed the experimental group's post-test was significantly higher, with "U = 142.000, p = .035". No effect size was printed.
"the results showed the post-test scores were significantly higher for the experimental group (Mdn = 63.15) than for the control group (Mdn = 46.05), U = 142.000, p = .035"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The control and experimental groups were statistically equivalent on the ESP pre-test before the clicker implementation — related
- The experimental group's ESP scores improved significantly from pre-test to post-test under clicker use, while the control group's did not — related
- During clicker implementation, students' average answering time decreased for both correct and incorrect answers while accuracy stayed nearly stable — related
- Students taught with Kahoot reported significantly higher learning motivation than students taught with paper quizzes — related
- A course section that reviewed with Kahoot no-stakes quizzes differed significantly in high-stakes multiple-choice exam scores from a section that reviewed with a study guide and lecture, a difference the authors report as improvement without printing group means — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.