Students rated their opinions of learning with the CoBl model at the high agreed level (overall mean 4.23)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Students gave a high degree of overall opinion about CoBl implementation (mean = 4.23, SD = 0.65), highest for searching and collecting information and practicing assignments (both mean = 4.50). → Kingpum et al. 2015

Evidence¶

Kingpum et al. 2015¶

Peerasak Kingpum, Chaiyot Ruangsuwan and Sumalee Chaicharoen. (2015). A development of a collaborative blended learning model to enhance learning achievement and thinking ability of undergraduate students at the Institute of Physical Education. Educational Research and Reviews. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2350

q2 · i? · design · r2

Questionnaire on CoBl implementation (5-level Likert, 33 items, alpha 0.96) administered to the experimental students. Highest-rated aspects were "they get better in searching and collecting Information" (X = 4.50, S.D. = 0.63) and "they can practice more on their assignment" (X = 4.50, S.D. = 0.63).

"the students gave high degree for overall opinion ( X = 4.23, S.D. = 0.65)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The CoBl model comprises four components and a three-phase instructional process with five pre-instruction steps and nine instructional steps — related
• Students expressed positive overall opinions of GBSRI, rating Independent Practicing highest and Post-writing lowest — related
• Experts rate the model's individual elements as appropriate at the highest level overall (Mean = 4.65, S.D. = 0.27), with learning achievement output rated High — related