Prior comparative evidence shows small intention–norm and intention–control associations and a TPB model significant in Thailand but not South Africa¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the combined South African and Thai sample reported by Mnguni et al. (2024b), intention associated weakly with subjective norm and PBC but moderately with behavioural beliefs, and the overall TPB model was significant in the Thai sample but not the South African sample. → Mnguni L 2026
Evidence¶
Mnguni L 2026¶
Mnguni L (2026) A Capability–Decision Model of teacher readiness for AI integration in teaching. Front. Educ. 11:1897632. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1897632
q2 · i? · theoretical · r3
The article reports, citing Mnguni et al. (2024b), that zero-order associations of intention with subjective norm (ρ = .144) and perceived behavioural control (ρ = .149) were small, whereas its association with behavioural beliefs was moderate (ρ = .331), and that the ordinal logistic regressions differed by country as quoted.
"the overall TPB model was significant in the Thai sample (n = 95), χ²(6) = 34.039, p < .001, Nagelkerke pseudo-R² = .404, but not in the South African sample (n = 97), χ²(6) = 4.252, p = .643, Nagelkerke pseudo- R² = .051."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Geographic distribution of the selected sample shows Asia (18 studies) and North America strongly represented, with Europe, Africa, and South America underrepresented — related
- The ToM–achievement association is significantly weaker in European samples than in Asian and North American samples — related
- Behavioral attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention are each negatively associated with GenAI-assisted learning procrastination — related
- GenAI use is positively associated with attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention toward GenAI-assisted learning — related
- TPB constructs indirectly link GenAI use to lower GenAI-assisted learning procrastination, accounting for about 30.9% of the total association — related
- CDM-AIR declares four falsification conditions, including moderation nullity and context redundancy — related
- Learning GenAI anxiety moderates the intention–procrastination association, which is negative and significant at high anxiety but absent at low anxiety — related
- University students' use of GenAI for learning task completion is negatively associated with GenAI-assisted learning procrastination — related
- Additive TPACK–belief integrations produce construct overlap, causal ambiguity, and weak intervention guidance — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
comparative-tpb-evidence-thailand-south-africa |
title |
Prior comparative evidence shows small intention–norm and intention–control associations and a TPB model significant in Thailand but not South Africa |
description |
Prior comparative evidence shows small intention–norm and intention–control associations and a TPB model significant in Thailand but not South Africa |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2029 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mnguni-l-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.