Claims

Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: local conditions change quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In the high school textbooks, comprehension (30%) and application (28%) were the most frequent learning objectives and evaluation the least frequent. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 q2 i? In the Interchange series, comprehension (27%) and application (29.5%) were most frequent and evaluation (2.3%) least frequent. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 (2)

Evidence

Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015

Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive frequency analysis of 572 coded learning objectives in the four high school textbooks (Table 1), with comprehension at 172 and application at 161 counts; evaluation had 10. Percentages are descriptive, no effect size printed.

"comprehension (%30) and application (%28) were the most frequent numbers of learning objectives and evaluation was reported as the least frequent one."

Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 (2)

Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94

q2 · i? · design · r2

Descriptive frequency analysis of 718 coded learning objectives in the four Interchange volumes (Table 2). The article notes "These two series were in much accord" and that the Interchange total outnumbered the high school total.

"comprehension (%27) and application (%29.5) were the most frequent numbers of learning objectives and the least frequent number was evaluation (%2.3) part."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id comprehension-application-most-frequent-objectives
title Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent
description Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
recheck_by 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015, mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.