Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the high school textbooks, comprehension (30%) and application (28%) were the most frequent learning objectives and evaluation the least frequent. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015
q2 i? In the Interchange series, comprehension (27%) and application (29.5%) were most frequent and evaluation (2.3%) least frequent. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94
q2 · i? · design · r2
Descriptive frequency analysis of 572 coded learning objectives in the four high school textbooks (Table 1), with comprehension at 172 and application at 161 counts; evaluation had 10. Percentages are descriptive, no effect size printed.
"comprehension (%30) and application (%28) were the most frequent numbers of learning objectives and evaluation was reported as the least frequent one."
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 (2)¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94
q2 · i? · design · r2
Descriptive frequency analysis of 718 coded learning objectives in the four Interchange volumes (Table 2). The article notes "These two series were in much accord" and that the Interchange total outnumbered the high school total.
"comprehension (%27) and application (%29.5) were the most frequent numbers of learning objectives and the least frequent number was evaluation (%2.3) part."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The Interchange series covered learning objectives more comprehensively than the Iranian high school textbooks — related
- Linguistic intelligence dominated both series while natural intelligence was least frequent — related
- The two textbook series differ significantly in the distribution of intelligences across learning objectives — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
comprehension-application-most-frequent-objectives |
title |
Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent |
description |
Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
recheck_by |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015, mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.