Linguistic intelligence dominated both series while natural intelligence was least frequent¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the Interchange series, linguistic intelligence (47%) was most frequent and natural intelligence (1.09%) least frequent. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015
q2 i? In the high school textbooks, linguistic intelligence (53%) was most frequent and natural intelligence (0.4%) least frequent. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 (2)
Evidence¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94
q2 · i? · design · r2
Descriptive frequency grid of 638 coded intelligence evidences in the Interchange series (Table 3): linguistic 300, logical 167, spatial 50, interpersonal 67, with musical, kinesthetic, intrapersonal and natural lowest. Descriptive percentages only.
"the most frequent kind of intelligence was linguistic intelligence (%47) and the least was natural intelligence (%1.09)."
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015 (2)¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94
q2 · i? · design · r2
Descriptive frequency grid of 476 coded intelligence evidences in the four high school textbooks (Table 4): linguistic 255, logical 123, with musical and intrapersonal at 4 each and natural at 2. Descriptive percentages only.
"the most frequent intelligence in the high school textbooks was linguistic intelligence (%53) while natural intelligence (%0.4) was the least in the grid."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The two textbook series differ significantly in the distribution of intelligences across learning objectives — related
- The Interchange series covered learning objectives more comprehensively than the Iranian high school textbooks — related
- Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
linguistic-intelligence-dominates-elt-textbooks |
title |
Linguistic intelligence dominated both series while natural intelligence was least frequent |
description |
Linguistic intelligence dominated both series while natural intelligence was least frequent |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
recheck_by |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015, mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.