The two textbook series differ significantly in the distribution of intelligences across learning objectives¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference between the two series' grids of intelligences and learning objectives. → Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015
Evidence¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari 2015¶
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari & Iman Abdi Tabari. (2015). Links between Bloom's Taxonomy and Gardener's Multiple Intelligences: The issue of Textbook Analysis. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.1p.94
q2 · i? · design · r2
Chi-square comparison of the coded frequency grids for the high school textbooks and the Interchange series, reported in the Results section: "a statistically significant difference between them (x2=52.11, df=7, ρ=0)". No effect size is printed.
"To determine the comparison between the two grids, a chi-square was run that showed a statistically significant difference between them (x2=52.11, df=7, ρ=0)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Chi-square analysis shows the distribution of learning theories in Iranian ELT textbooks differs significantly from chance — related
- Question cognitive-level distributions differed significantly between years for Physics 1B but not Physics 1A — related
- Explanation-quality distributions differed significantly between years for Physics 1A (2011 slightly lower) but not Physics 1B — related
- The Interchange series covered learning objectives more comprehensively than the Iranian high school textbooks — related
- Linguistic intelligence dominated both series while natural intelligence was least frequent — related
- Comprehension and application were the most frequent learning objectives in both series, with evaluation least frequent — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
elt-textbook-series-differ-bloom-mi-grid |
title |
The two textbook series differ significantly in the distribution of intelligences across learning objectives |
description |
The two textbook series differ significantly in the distribution of intelligences across learning objectives |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mahmoud-abdi-tabari-iman-abdi-tabari-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.