Claims

Control-group learners showed no statistically significant change in Willingness to Communicate from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A paired-samples t test found no statistically significant WTC change for the control group between pre-test and post-test. → Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Evidence

Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Abulfazl Mesgarshahr, Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh. (2014). The impact of teaching communication strategies on EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.4

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t test within the control group, which followed the regular EFL curriculum with no CS treatment, showed "no statistically significant difference in WTC s c o r e s f o r t h e c o n t r o l g r o u p" from pre-test to post-test (t (52) = 1.27, p > .05). No effect size is printed; equivalence was not tested.

"Table 3 shows that there was no statistically significant difference in WTC s c o r e s f o r t h e c o n t r o l g r o u p b e t w e e n t h e i r p e r f o r m a n c e s o n t h e p r e - t e s t (M = 37.17, SD = 24.41) and post-test (M = 43.79,SD = 28.59), with t (52) = 1.27, p > .05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.