Claims

Experimental-group learners became significantly more willing to communicate after receiving communication strategy training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A paired-samples t test showed a statistically significant WTC increase within the experimental group from pre-test to post-test. → Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Evidence

Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Abulfazl Mesgarshahr, Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh. (2014). The impact of teaching communication strategies on EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.4

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t test within the experimental group, which received CS training, found "a statistically significant differ- en c e in WT C sc o r e s" between pre-test (M = 42.84, SD = 27.76) and post-test (M = 63.46, SD = 28.04), with t(47) = 3.35, p < .05. No effect size is printed for this within-group comparison.

"For the experimental group, there was a statistically significant differ- en c e in WT C sc o r e s b et w een t h eir p er f o rm an c es o n t h e p r e-t es t (M = 42.84, SD = 27.76) and post-t est ( M = 63.46, SD = 28.04), with t(47) = 3.35, p < .05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.