Claims

Teaching communication strategies raises EFL learners’ classroom Willingness to Communicate more than regular instruction, with a large between-group difference (eta squared = .10)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i2 After CS training, the experimental group’s WTC scores were significantly higher than the control group’s, with a large mean difference (eta squared = .10). → Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Evidence

Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Abulfazl Mesgarshahr, Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh. (2014). The impact of teaching communication strategies on EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.4

q2 · i2 · causal · r1

Quasi-experiment with 8 intact pre-intermediate classes (experimental N = 58, control N = 62) at a private language institute; independent-samples t-test on post-test WTC questionnaire scores showed the experimental group (M = 59.21, SD = 27.31) exceeded the control group, and the article prints the effect size eta squared = .10, calling "the magnitude of the difference in the means was large (eta squared = .10)".

"and control group ( M = 42.79, SD = 27.64), with t(99) = 3.48, p< .05. Furthermore, the magnitude of the difference in the means was large (eta squared = .10)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.