Claims

Before treatment, experimental and control groups did not differ significantly in Willingness to Communicate

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A pre-test independent-samples t test found no statistically significant WTC difference between the experimental and control groups. → Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Evidence

Mesgarshahr and Abdollahzadeh 2014

Abulfazl Mesgarshahr, Esmaeel Abdollahzadeh. (2014). The impact of teaching communication strategies on EFL learners’ Willingness to Communicate. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.1.4

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Baseline check in the same intact-class quasi-experiment: an independent-samples t test on the 27-item WTC questionnaire showed "no statistically significant difference before the treatment" between groups (t(113) = 1.035, p>.05). Equivalence was not tested; no effect size is printed.

"There was no statistically significant difference before the treatment in the degree of WTC between the experimental group (M = 45.36, SD = 26.72) and the control group (M = 40.46, SD = 24.39), with t(113) = 1.035, p>.05."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.