Distributions of external control scores differ across school-function domains, with curriculum skewing toward internal control¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr1–r2·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Box plots show the assessment distribution skews high (median around 0.50 versus mean 0.61), while curriculum has the lowest median (0.15 versus mean 0.31), indicating most countries' principals report substantial internal control over curriculum. → Kim 2019
Evidence¶
Kim 2019¶
Kim, T. & Yun, J. T. (2019). Logics of accountability: Cross-national patterns in school-level controls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(119). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4597
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Box-plot analysis of country-average external control scores in the TALIS 2013 data. The article reports "the median and mean are quite far apart with the median (0.15) set at half the value of the mean (0.31)" for curriculum, and that the assessment distribution is non-normal and skews high.
"The lowest median was in curriculum, which shows half of the countries have their average external control scores below 0.15."
Kim 2019 (2)¶
Kim, T. & Yun, J. T. (2019). Logics of accountability: Cross-national patterns in school-level controls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 27(119). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.4597
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Same box-plot analysis of the four domains: HR shows the largest range (0–1) of country agreement on external control, while curriculum shows the smallest range with outliers Abu Dhabi, Cyprus, and Japan reporting very high external curricular control.
"In terms of range, HR shows the largest range (0–1), which suggests that countries’ levels of agreement with external control in HR have the most extreme values across countries."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Ability-distribution mismatch with the TESTFACT default does not significantly affect item difficulty estimates but slightly improves discrimination estimates — related
- Country classifications of control type differ sharply by domain: mixed control dominates assessment, internal control dominates curriculum — related
- Across 38 countries, external control is highest in assessment and lowest in curriculum and budget — related
- Extreme country cases: Spain reports universal external control of hiring while the Netherlands reports universal internal control of HR, curriculum, and budget — related
- A few countries follow relatively pure accountability logics, but most countries follow mixed forms — related
- Accountability strengths lie in school climate and communication while stakeholder-involved vision evaluation scores lowest — related
- Authorship scores were highly concentrated near the maximum of the rubric scale — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
control-score-distributions-vary-by-domain |
title |
Distributions of external control scores differ across school-function domains, with curriculum skewing toward internal control |
description |
Distributions of external control scores differ across school-function domains, with curriculum skewing toward internal control |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — kim-2019, kim-2019-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.