Accountability strengths lie in school climate and communication while stakeholder-involved vision evaluation scores lowest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The highest-scoring accountability indicators are a conducive atmosphere and harmonious communication with the school community; the lowest involve stakeholder-inclusive evaluation of vision, mission and objectives and use of evaluation results for improvement. → Teguh Triwiyanto 2024
Evidence¶
Teguh Triwiyanto 2024¶
Teguh Triwiyanto, Desi Eri Kusumaningrum, Ahmad Yusuf Sobri, Warapark Maitreephun. (2024). Accountability management system of superior elementary school for digital transformation. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), Vol. 18, No. 4. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i4.21692
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Indicator-level descriptive results from the Malang City questionnaire survey (Table 2). The article reports the conducive-atmosphere and harmonious-communication indicators scored highest (243 and 241, High) and vision/mission evaluation indicators lowest (226, Medium).
"The indicator for the variable of the superior school accountability management system that has the highest score is that the school shows a conducive atmosphere for the entire school community and the school shows harmonious communication with the school community."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The article asserts that excellent accountability management systems and digital transformation capabilities guarantee equal access to education for all students — related
- Across 38 countries, external control is highest in assessment and lowest in curriculum and budget — related
- Distributions of external control scores differ across school-function domains, with curriculum skewing toward internal control — related
- Extreme country cases: Spain reports universal external control of hiring while the Netherlands reports universal internal control of HR, curriculum, and budget — related
- Accountability management system indicator scores average higher than elementary schools' digital transformation capability indicator scores — related
- Higher-quality superior-school accountability management systems are associated with higher digital transformation capability in Indonesian public elementary schools — related
- Shared and well-communicated mission, vision, and goals are critical to district and CMO performance — related
- CHSRI small schools lack a shared vision of high-quality instruction, and the link between school themes and curriculum remains weak in year two — related
- Districts most often cite quality and integrity of the testing program as its strength, followed by identifying student strengths and weaknesses — related
- Teacher communication-technology competence scores highest while virtualizing-process technology use scores lowest among digital transformation indicators — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
accountability-indicator-strengths-weaknesses |
title |
Accountability strengths lie in school climate and communication while stakeholder-involved vision evaluation scores lowest |
description |
Accountability strengths lie in school climate and communication while stakeholder-involved vision evaluation scores lowest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — teguh-triwiyanto-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.