No publication bias is detected in the collected Covid-19 achievement estimates¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The Doi plot shows no asymmetry (LFK index = 0) and Egger's test accepts the null of no publication bias (p = 0.380). → Di Pietro Giorgio 2023

Evidence¶

Di Pietro Giorgio 2023¶

Di Pietro Giorgio. (2023). The impact of Covid-19 on student achievement: Evidence from a recent meta-analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100530

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Publication-bias assessment using the Doi plot and LFK index, supplemented by Egger's test where the null of no publication bias is accepted (p-value = 0.380); consistent with prior meta-analyses.

"the Doi plot shows no asymmetry (LFK index = 0), indicating that no publication bias is detected."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Publication bias is unlikely to explain the consistency of SRL intervention effect sizes — related
• Publication-bias checks indicate the pooled effect is unlikely to result from publication bias — related
• Egger's test suggests publication bias may be present, with the selection-model adjusted mean effect falling to 0.36 — related
• Publication bias is evident for Negative Behaviour and Anxiety/Stress across all RCTs and for Mindfulness in active-control RCTs, suggesting overestimation of MBI effects — related
• Publication bias is present in the embodied vocabulary learning literature, suggesting pooled effects may overestimate the true benefit — related
• Publication bias is indicated for the performance-approach and performance-avoidance anxiety effects but not for the depression effects — related
• No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis — related