Claims

No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Three bias-detection methods (Egger MLM, Egger sandwich, 3PSM) found no evidence of dissemination bias (all p > .10). → Bardach 2024

Evidence

Bardach 2024

Bardach, L., Bostwick, K. C. P., Fütterer, T., Kopatz, M., Memarpour Hobbi, D., Klassen, R. M., & Pietschnig, J. (2024). A Meta-Analysis on Teachers' Growth Mindset. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09925-7

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Three bias-detection methods suitable for multilevel meta-analyses were applied: Egger's regression with sandwich estimators, Egger's regression in a multilevel model, and a three-parameter selection (3PSM) approach. All p-values exceeded the .10 threshold for bias.

"We did not observe any evidence of bias based on the three detection methods we used (p = .316, .259, and .930 for Egger MLM, Egger sandwich, and 3PSM, respectively)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teacher-growth-mindset-no-dissemination-bias
title No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis
description No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bardach-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.