No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Three bias-detection methods (Egger MLM, Egger sandwich, 3PSM) found no evidence of dissemination bias (all p > .10). → Bardach 2024
Evidence¶
Bardach 2024¶
Bardach, L., Bostwick, K. C. P., Fütterer, T., Kopatz, M., Memarpour Hobbi, D., Klassen, R. M., & Pietschnig, J. (2024). A Meta-Analysis on Teachers' Growth Mindset. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09925-7
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Three bias-detection methods suitable for multilevel meta-analyses were applied: Egger's regression with sandwich estimators, Egger's regression in a multilevel model, and a three-parameter selection (3PSM) approach. All p-values exceeded the .10 threshold for bias.
"We did not observe any evidence of bias based on the three detection methods we used (p = .316, .259, and .930 for Egger MLM, Egger sandwich, and 3PSM, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Publication bias is detected in the cross-sectional data set, and bias-corrected estimates are highly heterogeneous — reports the opposite
- No publication bias is detected in the collected Covid-19 achievement estimates — related
- Publication-bias tests (Egger's test and trim-and-fill) indicate absence of publication bias for the overall effect and moderators — related
- Egger's test suggests publication bias may be present, with the selection-model adjusted mean effect falling to 0.36 — reports the opposite
- Publication bias is unlikely to explain the consistency of SRL intervention effect sizes — related
- Publication-bias checks indicate the pooled effect is unlikely to result from publication bias — related
- Publication bias analyses suggest the negative correlation is robust but trim-and-fill adjusts it to r = −.227 — related
- The pooled effect of writing instruction for US ELL students is robust to sensitivity analyses but funnel plot asymmetry suggests possible missing positive effect sizes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-growth-mindset-no-dissemination-bias |
title |
No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis |
description |
No evidence of dissemination bias was detected in the meta-analysis |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bardach-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.