Claims

Students who completed the Effective Presentations course showed significantly better delivery skills than non-course students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? CR 752 students had significantly clearer pronunciation (p = 0.0001), spoke at a more appropriate pace (p = 0.0483), pronounced words more accurately (p = 0.0499), and varied their intonation more (p = 0.0484) than non-CR 752 students. → Sukitkanaporn 2014

Evidence

Sukitkanaporn 2014

Sukitkanaporn, T., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2014). English Presentation Skills of Thai Graduate Students. English Language Teaching, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n3p91

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Cross-sectional survey of 26 conference attendees rating presenters on a five-point Likert scale. The article reports significant differences favoring CR 752 students on pronunciation, pace, accuracy, and intonation, with p-values as printed.

"They had clear pronunciation ( p = 0.0001), spoke at an appropriate pace ( p = 0.0483), pronounced words accurately (p = 0.0499), and varied their intonation (p = 0.0484)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.