Claims

Students who completed the Effective Presentations course used significantly better visual aids than non-course students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? CR 752 students' visual aids were significantly clearer (p = 0.0498), easier to understand (p = 0.0051), more interesting (p = 0.0338), showed relevant text on the same slide (p = 0.0118), and used color to emphasize a point (p = 0.0485) compared to non-CR 752 students. → Sukitkanaporn 2014

Evidence

Sukitkanaporn 2014

Sukitkanaporn, T., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2014). English Presentation Skills of Thai Graduate Students. English Language Teaching, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n3p91

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Cross-sectional survey of 26 conference attendees rating presenters on a five-point Likert scale. The article reports significant differences favoring CR 752 students on visual clarity, understandability, interest, text placement, and color use, with p-values as printed.

"Their visual aids used in the presentation were clear ( p = 0.0498), easy to understand ( p = 0.0051), and was interesting ( p = 0.0338). The presenters used visual ai ds that showed the relevant text on the same slide (p = 0.0118), and used color to emphasize a point (p = 0.0485)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.