Claims

Students who completed the Effective Presentations course showed significantly better organization and content skills than non-course students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? CR 752 students significantly outperformed non-CR 752 students in grabbing audience attention with their opening (p = 0.0004) and giving an overview of the presentation (p = 0.0058). → Sukitkanaporn 2014 q2 i? CR 752 students significantly outperformed non-CR 752 students in using linking expressions (p = 0.0063), summarizing key points (p = 0.0264), signaling when finishing (p = 0.0218), and clearly answering questions (p = 0.0209). → Sukitkanaporn 2014

Evidence

Sukitkanaporn 2014

Sukitkanaporn, T., & Phoocharoensil, S. (2014). English Presentation Skills of Thai Graduate Students. English Language Teaching, 7(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v7n3p91

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Cross-sectional survey of 26 conference attendees rating presenters on a five-point Likert scale. The article reports significant differences favoring CR 752 students on opening attention, overview, and linking expressions, with p-values as printed.

"the CR 752 students started by grabbing the audience's attention with his/her opening ( p = 0.0004) and giving the audience an overview of the presentation ( p = 0.0058). During the presentation, the presenters clearly used linking expression to move from one idea/topic/part to the next ( p = 0.0063)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.