Contextual teaching and learning produces higher argumentative writing scores than non-contextual instruction in university students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students taught with a contextual learning model scored significantly higher on argumentative writing than students taught with a non-contextual model. → Hasani 2016
Evidence¶
Hasani 2016¶
Hasani, A. (2016). Enhancing argumentative writing skill through contextual teaching and learning. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(16), 1573-1578. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113515
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Quasi-experiment with 52 second-year university students in Banten, Indonesia (26 experimental, 26 control), post-test design. The Tukey post-hoc test found "a significant difference between experiment and control groups"; descriptive means were 74.46 (contextual) vs 72.50 (non-contextual).
"Further, according to statistical test (Tukey Post -Hoc), there is a significant difference between experiment and control groups"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Writing Skills — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- High critical-thinking students write better arguments under contextual than non-contextual instruction — related
- Low critical-thinking students do worse in contextual than non-contextual instruction for argumentative writing — reports the opposite
- Brainstorming-strategy instruction produced significantly higher post-test writing performance than traditional instruction among English-major university students — related
- EFL students trained to use a rubric as an instructional tool outperformed control students on compare-and-contrast essay writing — related
- The process writing approach significantly improved academic writing success among first-year preschool teaching students relative to traditional instruction — related
- Flipped classroom instruction produced significantly better post-test writing scores than traditional instruction among Iraqi EFL sophomores — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.