Cyclic-sport students taught with the differentiated program gained more in front crawl technique (60% gain, 4.45 points) than control students (37.5% gain, 3.92 points)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Average front crawl technique marks for cyclic-sport students in the experimental group reached 4,45 (S = 0,43) with a 60% gain, versus 3,92 (S = 0,52) with a 37.5% gain in the control group. → Yermahanova 2016

Evidence¶

Yermahanova 2016¶

Yermahanova, A., Nurmakhambetova, D., Bozhig, Z., & Imanbetov, A. (2016). Evaluation of Features of Development of Sports Way of Swimming of Students of Various Sports Specialization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 10895-10904. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Results section comparison of experimental versus control cyclic-sport students on front crawl technique scores. The experimental group's mean of 4,45 (S = 0,43) with "a gain of 60%" exceeded the control mean of 3,92 (S = 0,52) with a 37.5% gain; only descriptive means and percentages are printed.

"Average marks for technique of the process of breast crawl on students cyclic sports experimental group was 4,45 (S = 0,43) points with a gain of 60% in the control group - 3,92 (S = 0,52) with a gain of 37 ,5%."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental groups across martial arts, sports games and complex-coordination specializations achieved larger gains in breaststroke and back crawl technique than control groups — related
• Differentiated exercise sets produce significantly larger improvements in swimming technique than traditional instruction for students in complex-coordination sports — related
• Students of different sports specializations enter swimming courses with different initial levels and sport-specific technique errors, complicating instruction under limited allocated hours — related