Experimental groups across martial arts, sports games and complex-coordination specializations achieved larger gains in breaststroke and back crawl technique than control groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Martial-arts experimental students scored 4,24 (S = 0,43) on breaststroke technique (68.2% gain) versus 3,71 (S = 0,64) in control (44.9%), and 4,34 (S = 0,43) on back crawl (66.9% gain) versus 3,79 (S = 0,61) in control (44.6%). → Yermahanova 2016 q2 i? Sports-games experimental students scored 4,28 (S = 0,29) on breaststroke (63.9% gain) versus 3,89 (S = 0,44) in control (50.7%), and 4,53 (S = 0,38) on back crawl (68.4% gain) versus 4,01 (S = 0.45) in control (52.4%). → Yermahanova 2016 (2)

Evidence¶

Yermahanova 2016¶

Yermahanova, A., Nurmakhambetova, D., Bozhig, Z., & Imanbetov, A. (2016). Evaluation of Features of Development of Sports Way of Swimming of Students of Various Sports Specialization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 10895-10904. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Results-section comparison for martial-arts students on breaststroke technique under the differentiated program versus traditional training; the experimental mean of 4,24 (S = 0,43) with "an increase of 68.2%" exceeded the control 3,71 (S = 0,64).

"The students of the experimental group received martial arts techniques for assessment method breaststroke 4,24 (S = 0,43) points, an increase of 68.2% in the control group score 3,71 (S = 0,64) score 44.9 %."

Yermahanova 2016 (2)¶

Yermahanova, A., Nurmakhambetova, D., Bozhig, Z., & Imanbetov, A. (2016). Evaluation of Features of Development of Sports Way of Swimming of Students of Various Sports Specialization. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(18), 10895-10904. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Results-section comparison for sports-games students on back crawl technique; the experimental group's 68.4% increase to 4,53 (S = 0,38) exceeded the control's 52.4% increase to 4,01 (S = 0.45).

"For the technique of the process on the back crawl average increased by 68.4% in the experimental group (4,53 (S = 0,38) points), in the control, the increase was lower by 52,4% (4,01 (S = 0.45) points."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Cyclic-sport students taught with the differentiated program gained more in front crawl technique (60% gain, 4.45 points) than control students (37.5% gain, 3.92 points) — related
• Differentiated exercise sets produce significantly larger improvements in swimming technique than traditional instruction for students in complex-coordination sports — a broader claim this one bears on
• Students of different sports specializations enter swimming courses with different initial levels and sport-specific technique errors, complicating instruction under limited allocated hours — related