Claims

The Statistical Reasoning Assessment instrument showed acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach alpha .82) in a 30-subject pilot study

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a pilot study with 30 subjects, the 13-question Statistical Reasoning Assessment obtained a Cronbach alpha of .82, which the authors take to indicate reliability. → Nanteni Ganesan & Leong Kwan Eu 2018

Evidence

Nanteni Ganesan & Leong Kwan Eu 2018

Nanteni Ganesan & Leong Kwan Eu. (2018). Effectiveness of Fathom on Statistical Reasoning among Form Four Students. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1192963

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pilot study conducted at secondary schools in Klang under conditions similar to the actual study, using internal-consistency reliability because the test was administered only once. The instrument has thirteen questions gauging statistical reasoning.

"There were 30 subjects in the sample ( N=30) participated and the Statistical Reasoning Assessment instrument obtained Cronbach Alpha of .82 hence the coefficient indicated that the instrument were reliable."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.