Deliberative policy proposals center on inclusive decision making governed by nonrepression and nondiscrimination principles¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Following Gutmann, deliberative educators hold that educational decisions should be taken through deliberation involving parents, citizens, and professional educators, bounded by principles of nonrepression and nondiscrimination. → Edda Sant 2019

Evidence¶

Edda Sant 2019¶

Edda Sant. (2019). Democratic Education: A Theoretical Review (2006–2017). Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319862493

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

The review's analysis of deliberative educational policy reports Gutmann's two principles guaranteeing inclusive deliberation: nonrepression, and nondiscrimination, where "Citizens cannot be denied participation in deliberative processes on the basis of group differences (Fraser-Burgess, 2012; Meens & Howe, 2016; Perry, 2009)." It links the second principle to the need for a democratic threshold, illustrated by the Mozert v. Hawkins case.

"Citizens cannot be denied participation in deliberative processes on the basis of group differences (Fraser-Burgess, 2012; Meens & Howe, 2016; Perry, 2009)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Deliberative discourse promotes pedagogies of public deliberation, which are critiqued for exclusion and consensus bias — a broader claim this one bears on
• Youth advisors report students are inadequately involved in school decision-making and want more transparent communication — related
• The authors argue deliberative democracy theory needs elaboration to reflect real-life politics — related
• Families appreciated school engagement efforts, but some family and community members expressed dissatisfaction with their inclusion in school governance — related
• Participatory discourse privileges action and praxis over communication and consensus, and treats elitism as antidemocratic — related
• Dialogic leadership is democratic: every participating individual has agency and power in decision-making — related