Claims

Studying the relation of content to audience demographic attributes does not adequately explain spectator response; social situation of contact is a significant factor

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q2
Currency · newest study 1953 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The study of the relation of content to demographic attributes of the audience (age, sex, education, etc.) does not adequately explain why the spectator responds as he does; the social situation of contact is a significant factor in experiencing mass communications. → Audio-Visual Communication Review 1953

Evidence

Audio-Visual Communication Review 1953

Audio-Visual Communication Review. (1953). Audio-Visual Communication Review, 158. https://eric.ed.gov/

q2 · i? · qualitative · r?

The digest's General Conclusions section for the Freadson interview study. The conclusion is explicitly scoped "at least in the case of the audience studied", a limited, non-representative audience of boys.

"the study of the relation of content to the demographic attributes of the audience (age, sex, education, etc.) does not adequately explain why the spectator responds as he does. It is clear that at least in the case of the audi- ence studied, the social situation of contact is a significant factor involved in experiencing mass eommunications."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.