Special-issue frameworks argue for design-thinking-based and originary theory development in learning design and technology¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoreticalr2–r3·q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Warr, Mishra, and Scragg argue the discipline should apply the same design thinking used for educational design to creating theory, so theory better bridges research and practice. → Richard E. West 2020
q1 i? McDonald and Yanchar argue the field should develop originary theory, generated by the scholars and practitioners intending to apply it, rather than importing often misfitted theory from other domains. → Richard E. West 2020 (2)
Evidence¶
Richard E. West 2020¶
Richard E. West, Peg Ertmer, Susan McKenney. (2020). The crucial role of theoretical scholarship for learning design and technology. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09770-9
q1 · i? · theoretical · r3
The editorial summarizes the Warr, Mishra, and Scragg paper's argument that design thinking should be applied "to instead create theory", claiming this can bridge research and practice and embed theory development into regular practice. Attributed summary; no data reported.
"Melissa Warr, Punya Mishra, and Benjamin Scragg begin by asking us as a discipline to apply the same design thinking and problem solving that we use in creating educational design to instead create theory."
Richard E. West 2020 (2)¶
Richard E. West, Peg Ertmer, Susan McKenney. (2020). The crucial role of theoretical scholarship for learning design and technology. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09770-9
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
The editorial summarizes the McDonald and Yanchar argument for "originary theory" over imported theory from other domains, which they say is often misfitted. Attributed summary of a theoretical paper; no data reported.
"Jason McDonald and Stephen Yanchar argue in their paper that our field should focus on developing originary theory, or theory generated by the scholars and practitioners intending to apply it. They contrast this with imported theory, brought from other domains, which is often misfitted."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Special-issue papers articulate theoretical frameworks for inquiry, problem-based learning, and teacher learning and technology integration — related
- Special-issue papers present theoretical frameworks for guiding online teaching practices, including framing of instruction, cognitive load in CSCL, and engagement — related
- Affordances of technology for collaborative learning are created through design to the extent that appropriate principles have been applied in an effective way — related
- Six response essays propose ways to action practical learning in online spaces, building on the Zacharia et al. (2015) guidance review — related
- The special issue aims to offer best practices and quick solutions for immediate teaching and learning needs — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
design-thinking-and-originary-theory-development |
title |
Special-issue frameworks argue for design-thinking-based and originary theory development in learning design and technology |
description |
Special-issue frameworks argue for design-thinking-based and originary theory development in learning design and technology |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — richard-e-west-2020, richard-e-west-2020-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.