Claims

Special-issue frameworks argue for design-thinking-based and originary theory development in learning design and technology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r2–r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Warr, Mishra, and Scragg argue the discipline should apply the same design thinking used for educational design to creating theory, so theory better bridges research and practice. → Richard E. West 2020 q1 i? McDonald and Yanchar argue the field should develop originary theory, generated by the scholars and practitioners intending to apply it, rather than importing often misfitted theory from other domains. → Richard E. West 2020 (2)

Evidence

Richard E. West 2020

Richard E. West, Peg Ertmer, Susan McKenney. (2020). The crucial role of theoretical scholarship for learning design and technology. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09770-9

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

The editorial summarizes the Warr, Mishra, and Scragg paper's argument that design thinking should be applied "to instead create theory", claiming this can bridge research and practice and embed theory development into regular practice. Attributed summary; no data reported.

"Melissa Warr, Punya Mishra, and Benjamin Scragg begin by asking us as a discipline to apply the same design thinking and problem solving that we use in creating educational design to instead create theory."

Richard E. West 2020 (2)

Richard E. West, Peg Ertmer, Susan McKenney. (2020). The crucial role of theoretical scholarship for learning design and technology. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09770-9

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The editorial summarizes the McDonald and Yanchar argument for "originary theory" over imported theory from other domains, which they say is often misfitted. Attributed summary of a theoretical paper; no data reported.

"Jason McDonald and Stephen Yanchar argue in their paper that our field should focus on developing originary theory, or theory generated by the scholars and practitioners intending to apply it. They contrast this with imported theory, brought from other domains, which is often misfitted."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id design-thinking-and-originary-theory-development
title Special-issue frameworks argue for design-thinking-based and originary theory development in learning design and technology
description Special-issue frameworks argue for design-thinking-based and originary theory development in learning design and technology
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — richard-e-west-2020, richard-e-west-2020-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.