The hypothesised three-variable structural model fits the survey data well across printed fit indices¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The structural model including digital competence, DIL and academic performance showed good fit on χ2, χ2/df, IFI, CFI, RMSEA and SRMR. → Mehrvarz 2021
Evidence¶
Mehrvarz 2021¶
Mehrvarz, Mahboobe; Heidari, Elham; Farrokhnia, Mohammadreza; Noroozi, Omid. (2021). The mediating role of digital informal learning in the relationship between students' digital competence and their academic performance. Computers & Education 167 (2021) 104184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104184
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Fit evaluation of the structural SEM on the 319-student dataset, as printed in the Results' structural model subsection. All reported indices fall within the thresholds the article adopts (χ2/df < 3, IFI and CFI > 0.90, RMSEA < 0.08, SRMR < 0.10).
"the structural model offered a good fit to the data (χ2 = 46.130, p = 0.0001; χ2/df = 1.53; IFI = 0.98; CFI = 0.98; RMSEA = 0.04; SRMR = 0.036)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Higher digital competence is positively associated with students' digital informal learning and academic engagement — related
- Digital informal learning has a positive effect on higher education students' academic performance in a cross-sectional SEM study — related
- Confirmatory factor analysis with 448 secondary students showed the 32-item SAICS measurement model has good fit and high validity and reliability — related
- The ACE-HE measurement model of affective, behavioral, and cognitive engagement fits online/blended survey data well — related
- Global-fit evidence does not clearly favor unidimensional over multidimensional academic resilience measurement models, as fit-index pass rates diverge by index — related
- The ACE-HE measurement model of institutional support for ABC engagement also fits the data well — related
- Confirmatory factor analysis supports a second-level participation style model with four combined styles and acceptable fit indices — related
- Confirmatory factor analysis on FICSMath data confirms the 4C/ID Model's four components fit secondary-tertiary mathematics instructional experiences (CFI = 0.907, RMSEA = 0.050) — related
- Higher education students' digital competence has a positive effect on their academic performance — related
- Higher education students' digital competence has a positive effect on their digital informal learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
dil-sem-model-good-fit |
title |
The hypothesised three-variable structural model fits the survey data well across printed fit indices |
description |
The hypothesised three-variable structural model fits the survey data well across printed fit indices |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mehrvarz-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.